Horrifying Technologies That Should Never Be Allowed To Exist

As we head deeper into the 21st century, we’re starting to catch a glimpse of the fantastic technological possibilities that await. But we’re also starting to get a grim sense of the potential horrors.Here are frightening technologies that should never, ever, come into existence.

Artificial Superintelligence

As Stephen Hawking declared earlier this year, artificial intelligence could be our worst mistake in history.the advent of greater-than-human intelligence could prove catastrophic. The introduction of systems far faster and smarter than us would force us to take a back seat. We’d be at the mercy of whatever the artificial superintelligence decides to do — and it’s not immediately clear that we’ll be able to design a friendly AI to prevent this.

Weaponized Nanotechnology

Nothing could end our reign here on Earth faster than weaponized — or severely botched — molecular assembling nanotechnology. It’s a threat that stems from two extremely powerful forces: unchecked self-replication and exponential growth. A sufficiently nihilistic government, non-state actor, or individual could engineer microscopic machines that consume our planet’s critical resources at a rapid-fire rate while replicating themselves in the process and leaving useless bi-products in their wake — a residue futurists like to call “grey goo.

Nanotechnology theorist Robert Freitas has brainstormed several possible variations of planet-killing nanotech, including aerovores (a.k.a. grey dust), grey plankton, grey lichens, and so-called biomass killers. Aeorovores would blot out all sunlight. (Sound like Chem-Trails?)

Mind Reading Devices

The prospect exists for machines that can read people’s thoughts and memories at a distance and without their consent. Last year, for example, scientists from the Netherlands used brain scan data and computer algorithms to determine which letters a person was looking at. The breakthrough hinted at the potential for a third party to reconstruct human thoughts at an unprecedented level of detail, including what we see, think, and remember. Such devices, if used en masse by some kind of totalitarian regime or police state, would make life intolerable.

Autonomous Robots Designed to Kill Humans

The potential for autonomous killing machines is a scary one — and perhaps the one item on this list that’s already an issue today.Futurist Michael LaTorra
We do not yet have a machine that exhibits general intelligence even close to the human level. But human level intelligence is not required for the operation of autonomous robots with lethal capabilities. Building robotic military vehicles of all sorts is already achievable. Robot tanks, aircraft, ships, submarines, and humanoid-shaped soldiers are possible today. Unlike remote-controlled drones, military robots could identify targets and destroy them without a human giving the final order to shoot.The greater danger lurks in the international arms race that could be set off if any nation deploys autonomous military robots. After a few cycles of improvement, the race to develop ever more powerful military robots could cross a threshold in which the latest generation of autonomous military robots would be able to outfight any human-controlled military system

Original Article Here


World’s First Biometric Credit Card


One step closer to a cashless Society?

The fear of identity theft and cyber-banking crime has been the latest sales pitch to encourage accepting identity tech such as vein scanners, facial recognition, voiceprints, iris scans – even tears – as well as their attendant databases. There is an ongoing cooperative effort between global banks and corporations to ensure that there will be standardized, centralized entry into the consumer/Internet/banking matrix of the future.

MasterCard is now partnering with a Norwegian company called Zwipe to introduce the first fully biometric credit card, which will dispense with a PIN and instead use a fingerprint sensor for verification.

Planet-wide biometric ID is the stated goal of corporations, as well as various globalist foundations.The transition to a cashless society continues while simultaneously incorporating an all-inclusive tracking database from which it will become very difficult to escape if one wishes to interact in any meaningful way with a modern-day economy.

The biometrics agenda goes far beyond financial transactions, but this is the most palatable way to introduce the concept as a logical necessity to solve myriad problems with banking security. This should be kept in mind as we find ourselves in the midst of a perfect storm of health crises where we are already hearing calls of Big Data to be employed for health tracking and BioSurveillance.

Via Activist Post

Things about the Mainstream media that they don’t want you to know.


Do you trust the news media? Do you believe that the information that they are giving you is true and accurate? If you answered yes to either of those questions, that places you in a steadily shrinking minority. on average Americans watch approximately 153 hours of television a month, but for their news they are increasingly turning to alternative sources of information. Big news channels such as CNN, MSNBC and Fox News are losing hordes of viewers, and they are desperately searching for answers. The mainstream media is slowly dying, but they will never admit it. They are still convinced that they can find some way to turn this around and regain the trust of the American people. But it simply is not going to happen. The following are facts about the U.S. news media that they do not want you to know.

Americans are increasingly turning to Facebook and other Internet sources for their news:At least that is what one recent survey discovered. It found that an astounding 48 percent of Americans got news about government and politics from Facebook within the past week. The numbers for CNN and Fox News were just 44 percent and 39 percent respectively.

Newspaper ad revenues are about a third of what they were back in the year 2000.:As Americans have discarded the print versions of their newspapers, newspaper ad revenues have experienced a decline that is absolutely unprecedented…
It took a half century for annual newspaper print ad revenue to gradually increase from $20 billion in 1950 (adjusted for inflation in 2013 dollars) to $65.8 billion in 2000, and then it took only 12 years to go from $65.8 billion in ad revenues back to less than $20 billion in 2012, before falling further to $17.3 billion last year.

The news media is far more liberal than the American people:We hear much about the supposed “conservative bias” of Fox News, but the truth is that overall the U.S. public considers the news media to be extremely liberal. Gallup found that 44 percent of all Americans consider the news media to be “too liberal”, and only 19 percent of all Americans consider the news media to be “too conservative”.

Fox News is not nearly as “conservative” as you think that it is:Fox News may be constantly promoting a “Republican agenda”, but that does not mean that it is conservative. This is especially true when it comes to social issues. Some of their anchors are extremely socially liberal, one of the top executives at Fox News is a big Hillary Clinton supporter, and 21st Century Fox/News Corp. has given the Clintons more than 3 million dollars since 1992.

Even though the mainstream media is dying, they still have an overwhelmingly dominant position: there are just six enormous media conglomerates that combine to produce about 90 percent of all the media that Americans consume. This is why “the news” seems to be so similar no matter what channel you watch.
But we aren’t just talking about control of the news media. These giant media corporations also own movie studios, newspapers, magazines, publishing houses, video game makers, music labels and even many of our favorite websites.So we should be thankful that their media monopoly is finally crumbling.Nobody should have that much power over what the American people see, hear and think about.

Via Intellihub

Original Article Here

Vote all you want. The secret government won’t change.

shadow government1

The voters who put Barack Obama in office expected some big changes. From the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping to Guantanamo Bay to the Patriot Act, candidate Obama was a defender of civil liberties and privacy, promising a dramatically different approach from his predecessor.

But six years into his administration, the Obama version of national security looks almost indistinguishable from the one he inherited. Guantanamo Bay remains open. The NSA has, if anything, become more aggressive in monitoring Americans. Drone strikes have escalated. Most recently it was reported that the same president who won a Nobel Prize in part for promoting nuclear disarmament is spending up to $1 trillion modernizing and revitalizing America’s nuclear weapons.

Why did the face in the Oval Office change but the policies remain the same? Critics tend to focus on Obama himself, a leader who perhaps has shifted with politics to take a harder line. But Tufts University political scientist Michael J. Glennon has a more pessimistic answer: Obama couldn’t have changed policies much even if he tried.

Though it’s a bedrock American principle that citizens can steer their own government by electing new officials, Glennon suggests that in practice, much of our government no longer works that way. In a new book, “National Security and Double Government,” he catalogs the ways that the defense and national security apparatus is effectively self-governing, with virtually no accountability, transparency, or checks and balances of any kind. He uses the term “double government”: There’s the one we elect, and then there’s the one behind it, steering huge swaths of policy almost unchecked. Elected officials end up serving as mere cover for the real decisions made by the bureaucracy.

GLENNON: “I think the American people are deluded,the institutions that provide the public face actually set American national security policy. They believe that when they vote for a president or member of Congress or succeed in bringing a case before the courts, that policy is going to change. But the larger picture is still true—policy by and large in the national security realm is made by the concealed institutions”. The ultimate problem is the pervasive political ignorance on the part of the American people.And indifference to the threat that is emerging from these concealed institutions. That is where the energy for reform has to come from: the American people. Not from government. Government is very much the problem here.

Via Reddit

Original Article Here

Ebola Crisis: Evidence of pre-planning?


As the ebola virus crisis worsens in Africa with at least 4000 dead, we’ve seen the emergence of the first confirmed infection and death in the U.S. along with many other suspected cases. The question to be asked here,is could this have been prevented? Is the crisis so far out of hand, or is this something that has been planned for some time now?

CDC Suggests “Hermetically Sealed Caskets” For Ebola Victims – (“Fema Coffins”)

In a story for Yahoo News , the CDC says that in the event of an Ebola outbreak in the U.S ., bodies of the deceased would be required to be buried within ” hermetically sealed caskets “, which would prevent the escape of microbes during funerals.An administrator of the Dallas Institute Of Funeral Service interviewed in the article states that he has never come across any such caskets in his industry, meaning, hermetically sealed coffins are NOT common in the slightest for burial.

These CDC coffins in Madison, Georgia, though, ARE designed to prevent spread of infection. In fact, the patent for these coffins confirms that they are meant for the burial or cremation of bodies exposed to infectious diseases.

This would suggest that the CDC has stockpiled such coffins specifically in preparation for a viral outbreak. Meaning, the CDC has been expecting the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans due to infection for at least the past six years. That is a LONG period of preparation. Such preparation requires certainty, not hypothesis, especially were the federal government is involved.

“Disaster Teams Were Notified Months Ago They Would Be Activated in October”

A public tweet from a large government supplier of emergency response products specializing in “high risk events” says that Disaster Assistance Response Teams were told to prepare to be activated in the month of October. The shocking revelation, made on the Goldenstate Fire/EMS Twitter page, suggests that not only did someone know that the Ebola virus would be reaching America, but that they knew exactly when it would happen.

“What we are now hearing is just the tip of the iceburg as we enter October,” noted the company’s Twitter spokesperson. “Ebola virus will cripple EMS and hospitals.”

When Future Money Trends, a follower of the page, asked what they meant by this statement, Goldenstate Fire/EMS responded with a shocking revelation.

“DART teams were notified months ago they would be activated in October. Timing seems weird. Source: current DART member.”


Recently with the Bush and Obama administrations, the President updated several Executive Orders over the last several years authorizing, among other things, forced quarantines and round-ups in the event of a pandemic emergency and the appropriation of private resources like food, water and human labor.

Did the U.N just pass a Global Patriot Act?

While all the worlds eyes were on Ebola,The UN passed a new resolution resembling a Worldwide Patriot Act.So while the world is in a panic over the Ebola crisis, the Power Elite are taking full advantage.

UN resolution 2178: “:Through resolution 2178 (2014), adopted unanimously during a meeting that heard from over 50 speakers, the Council condemned violent extremism and decided that Member States shall, consistent with international law, prevent the “recruiting, organizing, transporting or equipping of individuals who travel to a State other than their States of residence or nationality for the purpose of the perpetration, planning of, or participation in terrorist acts”.

Under the guise of “Fighting Terrorism”, once again we have the framework for a global police state.Resolution 2178 is like déjà vu all over again – hastily drafted at the insistence of the U.S. and adopted in a moment of international crisis. But there are serious problems with this resolution. Crucially, it fails to define “terrorism”

Original Story Here

9/11 Official Story falling Apart

Secret 9/11 Documents: “Implausible” that the 9/11 Hijackers Acted Without Government Backing:Three Congressmen Call for Release of Joint Senate-House Intelligence Committee Report,Congressman Thomas Massie read the 28 classified pages of the Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry into 9/11 and immediately called for them to be released to the public.
Bob Graham long with 9/11 Commissioner and former Senator Bob Kerrey – said in sworn declarations that the Saudi government is linked to the 9/11 attacks. They’re calling for either a “permanent 9/11 commission” or a new 9/11 investigation to get to the bottom of it.Many other top U.S. counter-terrorism officials say that the government’s explanation of the 9/11 hijackers being “lone wolves” connected only to Al Qaeda is ridiculous.

FBI Whistleblower: Pentagon, CIA, NATO and MI6 Were Masterminds Behind 9/11: Sibel Edmonds a former FBI translator who translated terror-related communications for the FBI right after 9/11. Edmonds states that Osama Bin Laden – and several other members of his family – were working with U.S. agencies as part of Gladio B right up until 9/11. Edmonds notes that Bin Laden and his family members were helping the West set up terrorist groups in Chechnya up until 9/11.Edmonds has previously stated that Bin Laden – and his number 2 Al Qaeda lieutenant – Ayman al-Zawahiri – worked with the U.S. government for 3 months AFTER 9/11

VP Cheney Issued 9/11 Stand Down Order While Missile Approached Pentagon: Former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta Confirmed That Dick Cheney Ordered Stand Down on 9/11.

The Vice President of these United States of America officially issues stand down orders regarding an incoming airliner/missile heading toward the Pentagon and the Mainstream Media (MSM) goes completely AWOL on the matter … for 13 years? !

UK Prime Minister: 9/11 Truthers and “Extremists” Should be Eradicated


David Cameron recently delivered a massive dose of propaganda to the people of the UK and the world, perpetuating a philosophy of violence against peaceful people and relentless aggression.In a recent speech addressed to the UN, he said “non violent extremism” is as dangerous as violent terrorism, and must be eradicated using every weapon at any government’s disposal.

If you thought Obama’s War is Peace speech to the U.N. was creepy, wait until you get a load of this. Cameron is officially announcing the plan to use a full assault on dissenting views.

This could be considered a declaration of war upon anyone representing ideas that are inherently against the philosophy of government, power structures, centralized power and currency.This representative of death and wars of aggression even went as far as to reference 9/11 truthers. He basically said he wishes to ‘eradicate’ 9/11 truthers, while acknowledging that these tactics would clearly be in violation of freedom of speech

Original Story Here