Las Vegas Shooting: More questions than (official) answers

Authored/Edited- RS Hart

The Las Vegas Mass shooting of October 1st 2017 has at this point fallen off the radar of mainstream news. In the event’s wake there are more questions than officially sanctioned answers, with more than a few anomalies that the mainstream media refuses to acknowledge. In the weeks and months following the shooting, the official narrative of what had happened had changed a total of 3 times. And now the official story of a lone gunman is in dispute even according to the mainstream news own reporting

So to keep up to snuff on the official story it goes something like this:
On the night of October 1, 2017, at 10:05 p.m. Stephen Paddock (1 man) armed with At least 23 firearms,began shooting at the crowd of the Route 91 Harvest music festival firing more than 1,100 rounds from his suite on the 32nd floor of the nearby Mandalay Bay hotel. The shooting itself lasting 15 minutes,with the total time of the event lasting over an hour,until he was found dead of a self inflicted gun shot wound in his hotel room. In the end 58 people are killed and 851 injured.

So pretty simple right? Another crazed mass shooter opens fire, People are dead, it’s another unforseen tragedy in recent American history. Here’s where it a gets a little tricky, despite the official narrative of Stephen paddock being the lone shooter, were also told that he had planned this out on more than one occasion. And being that he was such a meticulous planner this is carried out by him alone with no assistance. Paddock had checked into the hotel September 25th, giving him 7 days to prep and plan and to move an arsenal of weapons and cache of surveillance equipment into the hotel. Meanwhile not one staff member of the hotel reported anything suspicious or noticed a lone senior citizen moving an arsenal of weaponry into his hotel room and drilling in to the walls and door installing security cameras.

The Revised Timeline (A.K.A The shooting before the shooting)

So here’s where the official story (continues) to get a little screwy. Prior to the actual shooting,hotel “security gaurd” Jesus campos is sent to the 32nd floor to investigate an open-door alarm. Upon his arrival at the 32nd floor and finding a barred door Campos gained access to the 32nd floor. When Stephen paddock saw him approaching, Paddock came out of a room and fired over 200 rounds of shots at the security gaurd. Miraculously hitting him 1 time in the leg (A 1 in 200 chance) The final revised timeline of the shooting as per LVMPD goes as such:

So in the official 5 minute time frame between an all out barrage of bullets being fired inside the hotel room,up until when the shooter began firing at the crowd nobody thought to call 911? Well that’s been confirmed,yet no one in the mainstream media will question why?

In total it took police 72 minutes to fully respond,and to find the source of the shooting and to assemble a force to enter the room. Yet workers inside the hotel,including Jesus campos himself confirmed via radio that it was on the 32nd floor.

Maintenance radioed a hotel dispatcher, telling her to take action.

“Call the police, someone’s firing a gun up here. Someone’s firing a rifle on the 32nd floor down the hallway.”

Here’s Jesus campos audio report of “shots fired. Does this sound like someone who just faced a hail of bullets and was shot in the leg?

Seems a little odd doesn’t it?

So who is (Was?) Jesus Campos? (Spooked, or spook?)

If you’re one to believe the official story like a majority of Americans being lied to by the mainstream news, Jesus campos is a hero, who took a bullet (literally) to help get people out of the Hotel as the shooting was happpening. But a little investigation turns up some odd facts about Mr Campos, not to mention his own odd behavior in the wake of the massacre.

Jesus campos is reported to be a Security gaurd in the employment of MGM. Yet upon inquiry his name does not appear on a public state list of registered security gaurds. Every security guard in the state of Nevada has to register as an armed or unarmed guard with the state’s Private Investigator’s Licensing Board (PILB).

There is no Jesus Campos licensed with the PILB.

Jesus Campos Name also did not appear in a search of MGM resorts international employee” workday” log. Workday is the official database used by MGM to keep track of employee profiles, and lists workers by the beginning letter of their first name.

In the same night after the Shooting, Campos is reported to have visited a UMC urgent care center to receive care for his wounded leg. Yet according to a spokesperson at the UMC Quick Care,they had “heard nothing” about Campos visiting them.

Odd no? Obviously campos was treated for a high powered rifle slug to the leg somewhere, yet nobody can say where?

Or was this a confabulation? As per the official LVMPD report of the shooting, the extent of Campos injury is quoted as a wound from a BB/Pellet gun. Jesus campos claims that he escaped “rapid gun fire” yet released footage of Campos after the incident show’s him ambulatory with no visible injuries to the leg

So what are we supposed to believe here? Campos conflicting accounts,or the obvious evidence before our eyes? Is Jesus campos story disinformation/misinformation? Is Jesus campos an actor playing a scripted role? if his story can fall apart under scrutiny,how is it the constantly revised timeline of events of the shooting are to be taken as a literal truth?

Multiple Shooters At The Event?

While the established official narrative is that Stephen Paddock was the lone shooter, what is to be made of conflicting reports from witnesses of multiple shooters? Was this simply part of the initial confusion of the event? Is this all just a case of misreporting by witnesses?

Witness and shooting victim Rocky Palermo surmised the possibility of multiple shooters.

“Palermo strongly believes there were between 3-5 active shooters during the attack because as he ran away from the initial gunfire, he describes bullets not only raining down, but flying horizontally at the crowd”.”Palermo says he relayed his theory to the FBI during an interview while being discharged from the hospital, but has not heard any follow up since”.

Among social media posts of witnesses of the incident there were multiple reports of multiple shooters in multiple locations,including the Ceasers palace casino, New york,New york,The Belagio and Tropicana. This could be attributed to the initial confusion of the event,But even law enforcement teams initially believed that there were multiple shooters.  Since the shooting no concrete(officially recognized) evidence has emerged of multiple shooters.

The Strobe Light Anomaly.
Video footage of a strobe light flashing on the 4th floor during the time of the event had lead some to claim that this was muzzle flashes from other shooters on other floors. But it has been demonstrated that the strobe light was seen in footage before and after the event. Yet the question has to be asked,WHY was there a strobe light flashing on the same side of the hotel where the gunfire was coming from? Was this a diversion tactic? Was this placed there to perpetrate a multiple shooters story and then have it discredited as a simple strobe light?

The initial police response had difficulty in tracking the origin of the gunfire, and police officers audio even reported seeing the strobe light flashing on the 4th floor. Yet beyond this,there is no explanation of the strobe light,was it a local alarm? Was the strobe light placed in the window intentionally to distract police and investigators? or was this just a coincide that happened that just so happened on the night of the shooting?

Suspicious events surrounding the Shooting

In the aftermath of the shooting there were more than a few unexplained anomolies surrounding the case. Just days after the shooting,Stephen paddock’s Reno NV home had been broken into while under FBI surveillance. The final report was that the home was broken into,and that nothing had been stolen. Yet there was no explanation as to how,and no suspects were apprehended. Odd that paddock’s home would be targeted,and nothing stolen after the shooting isn’t it? This incident was not commented upon in the final report as well.

Missing Hard Drive?
There were multiple reports that at least one the laptops found in Stephen paddock’s hotel room had a missing hard drive. Was this a deliberate move on the shooters part,or was this covering deeper tracks leading to others possibly involved with Paddock? Was the break in at his home connected to this reported missing hard drive,and covered up by the FBI and other law enforcement. Again there is no mention in the official report of missing hard drives.

E-mail’s for Gun Sales….(To Himslef,as per the FBI)

Revealed in the FBI warrants are E-mail conversations that Paddock had between several e-mail addresses that were registered to him. 3 months prior to the shooting, theses e-mails discuss what is basically a sales pitch for Ar-15 rifles,and rifles with modified bump stocks(which are said to be the same weapons used in the shooting).

the E-mail address is said to belong to Paddock,as well as the address is registered to Stephen Paddock in Mesquite AZ.

So what is going on here? Was Paddock trying to sell himself weapons that he already owned? According to the FBI and police they investigated these e-mails yet saw no interaction between Paddock and others that might be involved in the shooting. While the e-mails don’t specifically lay out any plans between Paddock and others to participate in the shooting,The FBI say’s that there isn’t anything suspicious happening in these communications.

The Botched Paddock Autopsy

Paddock’s official autopsy was released on February 9th 2018, 5 months after the incident and not without legal wrangling and redactions in the final report. With the actual autopsy occuring on October 6th,6 days after what was reported as paddocks death. The official time and date of death being October 2nd 1200(Noon) 1 full day after what was reported as Paddock committing suicide. So how is this possible? Is this erroneous information,yet another example of misreporting? Is this another indicator of incompetence in this case or obvious obfuscation? So now in this case you have at least two main characters in the investigation (County Coroner’s office & County Sheriff’s office) making convoluted and contradictory statements about the shooting.
As per the coroners report Paddock’s death was found to be suicide,via an intraoral gunshot wound of the head. The supposedly leaked photo’s of paddocks dead body,show (Paddock’s?) dead body with a gunshot wound to the head,yet also in this leaked photo there is a suspicious blood spot to the center of the chest. Was this blood spatter from the self inflicted Gunshot wound? or was this a separate gunshot wound to the chest? (not noted in the autopsy) Also Paddock’s body was cremated post mortem,so that eliminates the possibility of a second autopsy or independent investigation of the supposed killers body.

The Unexplained Swat Gunshots

2 weeks after the October 1st incident it was admitted by the LVMPD that an officer had discharged his weapon in Paddock’s hotel suite. As per the press releases “The gun went off after the officers made entry to the room, but the rounds were not fired in the room where Paddock was found dead.” Now try and make sense out of that statement, in other words a weapon was fired and we have no accountability as for why. Once again this is a detail that is missing from the LVMPD final report on the shooting, there is no mention or accountability of this in the report. Why was this gun fired in the Hotel room? where is the ballistics accountability? Can these unexplained gun shots be linked to the unexplained (apparent) wounds on paddock’s chest?

Insider Trading and Foreknowledge of the Event?

Much like the suspicious insider trading prior to 9-11,In the months prior to the event there were stock trades and put options placed against MGM resorts international, which owns the Mandalay Bay. The most notable being MGM CEO James Murren,who dumped 259,760 shares of stock on the 7th of September, 2017,and another 34,390 shares on the 8th for a total value of $10,024,632 and he did so during a time when the value of the stock was apparently rising.The day after the shooting MGM Resorts International stock fell 5.7%. Pretty good Deal for James Murren,not so much for his company.
Murren was’nt the only high profile name to profit from stock trading against MGM. On August 14, 2017, George Soros placed a put call for 1,350,000 shares on MGM Resorts International for a profit of $42,242,000. Overall in the month of September approximately 6 million shares of MGM were sold by officers and/or directors of the company, totaling approximately $200 million in proceeds to sellers. For an in depth detailed report of the MGM profiteers and possible insider stock trading,you can read more at ZeroHedge: Insider Trading and Financial Anomalies Surrounding the Las Vegas Attack

Final conclusions

On the night of October 1st 2017 58 people DID lose their lives and hundreds of others were wounded. Despite what the Disinfo conspiracy theorists claim this was a real criminal event. Could there have been actors involved (Jose Campos?), sure, but there was no fake blood,fake injuries or fake deaths.Anyone trying to sell you differently is trying to lead you down the path of misleading Disinformation. However there are real anomalies in this event,and anomalies in the official investigation. Can it all be chalked up to bungling and corruption? I don’t think so,despite the official pronouncements,there are pieces of evidence that haven’t been explained. The unexplained SWAT gun shots,Paddock’s own surveillance video (apparently of himself and the hallway) has not been released, The mysterious break in at the shooters home,and his communication (obviously with some one else) about gun sales.

There is a much that isn’t known about Paddock himself that remains suspicious.Apparently he was self made (retired) millionaire,yet despite having nothing but opportunity he choose to plan a mass murder and go out in a (self inflicted)blaze of glory. His apparent execution of the event showed nothing but exact planning and forethought,from the selection of the Hotel suite and the conjunction with the concert below.To smuggling weapons and surveillance equipment in without anyone being the wiser. Meanwhile we are led to believe that he was mentally ill lone wolf. this doesn’t sound like the behavior of a retiree with nothing better to do than just plan a mass murder.

And so that’s where the trail ends, much like similar cases with “Lone nut” gunmen, there is a conclusion and no further investigation of additional involvement in such an incredulous event. Will the public ever get a full and accurate accounting of this event? I’d have to say probably not,there is too much below the surface that would most likely damage the reputation of the FBI and LVMPD. The truth will only come out through independent investigation, but at that this point it is next to impossible with key pieces of evidence(Paddock’s body) either missing or obfuscated. I can only hope that there are enough minds out there(Fellow Conspiracy researchers) willing to question the official narrative and dig up links and evidence that will lead to an independent truthful investiagtion.


9/11’s “Known Knowns”


Years of willful deception, the sands of time, and simple neglect all tend to cloud our perception of the reality of history. This is especially true for politically radioactive topics like 9/11. With the debate over 9/11 heating up at the 15th anniversary of that fateful day, it’s a good time to get back up to speed.

There are essential pillars of the 9/11 debate that must be acknowledged by all parties before any healthy discussion of that paradigm-changing topic can take place.
What follows is a refresher list of “known knowns” — select, broad aspects of 9/11 that are at present beyond reasonable doubt:

. The money (financial funding and Fraud) trail was never followed to its logical conclusion. The 9/11 Commission concluded the question of who funded the attacks “was of little practical significance.”

. The Bush Administration pushed back against any independent investigation into 9/11.Once the White House agreed to an investigation, it provided a budget of $3 million, or 27% of the amount requested by 9/11 Commission co-chairs, Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton.

. The Bush White House’s first choice to lead the 9/11 Commission was the highly controversial Henry Kissinger. Under intense pressure due to conflicts of interest, he resigned a month later. The 9/11 Commission was compromised by having White House policy advisor Philip Zelikow as its executive director. He was alleged to have been in close contact with controversial White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove throughout the investigation.

. Saudi agents — some with ties to the White House — sent financial and logistical support to men who then provided that support to the hijackers. That’s according to the Congressional 2002 Joint Inquiry report, multiple media accounts and at least one FBI agent who worked on 9/11 cases. Efforts to further investigate Saudi nationals were resisted by the White House and CIA over and over again.

. Indian intelligence, corroborated by the FBI, showed a wire transfer of $100,000 from the phone of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief Mahmud Ahmad to 9/11 lead hijacker Mohammed Atta in 2000. Ahmad was in Washington D.C. on the morning of the attacks, meeting with US lawmakers.(including a Future Director of the C.I.A.)

. The $100,000 transaction was never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission report — and Ahmad was never detained for questioning.

. Multiple, overlapping war game drills created some level of confusion at the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and the Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) on the morning of the attacks.

. Around noon on 9/11, air traffic controllers who handled some of the hijacked flights made a recording recalling their experiences of the events from a few hours earlier. The tape was later destroyed by an unidentified FAA supervisor without any transcripts taken.(destruction of evidence in a criminal investigation)

. Blaming Iraq was the talking point advanced by the Bush administration within days of the attacks. Later, multiple reports surfaced alleging that the neoconservatives who made up the hawkish Project for a New American Century think tank and the Bush Administration had been planning for and discussing the need to publicly justify an invasion of Iraq (and Afghanistan) long before 9/11.

This is by no means a full list of inadequately-investigated facts surrounding 9/11.
People loyal to the official narrative at first denied the veracity of many of these facts. Later, when the corroborations and confirmations became overwhelming, they shifted gears, insisting these “knowns” didn’t matter.

Via Who What Why

Destroying the Evidence: Michael Hastings Cremated Despite Family Wishes to reclaim his Body


Michael Hastings died on June 18th after his Mercedes crashed into a tree and had burst into flames in the Hancock Park neighborhood of Los Angeles, causing speculation to arise that Hastings, who was working on a major exposé of the CIA, and NSA Spying.

Hours before the car crash Hastings had sent out an email to family and friends claiming that he was onto a big story and needed to “off the rada[r] for a bit.” WikiLeaks made the claim that Hastings had contacted them and said that the FBI was investigating him.

His Remains were hastily cremated against the wishes of his family, adding to the mystery surrounding the death of the Rolling Stone journalist. This week, Hastings’ friend SSgt. Joe Biggs said authorities cremated Hastings without permission from the family. Reports said that Hastings was so badly burned in the crash that it took days for a positive identification.

Accounts of the death of Michael Hastings have fueled many conspiracy theories. Eyewitnesses said just before the crash they heard an explosion that sounded like a bomb going off.

Richard Clarke, a former State Department official and adviser to several United States presidents, said the crash looked to be consistent with a “car cyberattack,” one orchestrated by a computer to seize control of the car.

Biggs said he will continue to investigate the death of his friend.

“This wasn’t an accident and I will continue to investigate his death,” he said of friend Michael Hastings.

Via Secrets of the Fed

Original Story Here

Investigative Journalist Michael Hastings, Dies in Suspicious Car “Accident”


Michael Hastings, the fearless journalist whose reporting brought down the career of General Stanley McChrystal, has died in a car accident in Los Angeles, Rolling Stone has learned. He was 33.

A contributing editor to Rolling Stone, Hastings leaves behind a remarkable legacy of reporting, including an exposé of America’s drone war, an exclusive interview with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange at his hideout in the English countryside, an investigation into the Army’s illicit use of “psychological operations” to influence sitting Senators and a profile of Taliban captive Bowe Bergdahl, “America’s Last Prisoner of War.”

Via Rolling Stone

Wikileaks: Michael Hastings Said FBI Was Tracking Him Hours Before His Death

WikiLeaks says journalist Michael Hastings, 33, killed in a fiery crash early Tuesday morning after his Mercedes plowed into a tree near the corners of Melrose and Highland Avenues, had contacted the organization hours earlier to say he was the subject of an FBI investigation.

“Michael Hastings contacted WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson just a few hours before he died, saying that the FBI was investigating him.”

Witnesses to the crash: “It sounded like A Bomb went off”

(note in the video that the Feul tank is still fully intact, as well as the Engine, and transmission which was ejected from the frame of the car)


C.I.A Assasination Manual: “Cars are arguably one of the softest targets when it comes to assassinations”. “For secret assassination, either simple or chase, the contrived accident is the most effective technique. When successfully executed, it causes little excitement and is only casually investigated.

Investigators claim government falsified TWA 800 air crash probe


Former investigators of the TWA Flight 800 airplane crash have revealed that an explosion came from outside the plane, thereby contradicting the government’s conclusion that the fatal crash was an accident.

The investigators claim they were silenced from telling the truth by their superiors, and were forced to conclude that the 1996 crash was an accident sparked by a fuel tank explosion. In a new EPIX film called “TWA Flight 800”, the former National Transportation Safety Board investigators communicate their beliefs that an outside explosion was responsible for the deadly crash that occurred nearly 17 years ago, killing all 230 people on board.

Several witnesses alleged that they saw a streak of light moving toward the aircraft before it exploded, leading some to believe that an anti-aircraft missile or rocket was responsible for the explosion. But an NTSB report drawn up after a 16-month investigation concluded that the “accident” was a result of faulty wiring that caused an electrical short circuit in the fuel gauge line, thereby resulting in a devastating fuel tank explosion. All NTSB employees and investigators were forced to stand by this conclusion, whether or not they believed it, the film’s producers said in a statement.

Despite the NTSB’s report, some Americans continued to believe that the plane was fatally struck by a missile or rocket. They were termed conspiracy theorists, and their beliefs long overshadowed by the government’s official conclusion. Pierre Salinger, a former Press Secretary for John F. Kennedy and a reporter for ABC News, claimed he had seen proof that the US Navy shot down the plane. He argued that the government covered up the truth to hide the agency’s fatal mistake.

Original Story: RT

Yahoo News story


Was TWA 800 Shot Down By a Military Missile?

CIA sued over 1950s ‘murder’ of government scientist plied with LSD

Frank olson was possibly not the only one silenced by the CIA, the body count includes other high level government officials who died in a manner suspiciously similar to Frank Olson. James forrestal First secreatry of defense,(and founding member of Majestic 12) and james duggan a state department intelligence asset, were both connected to the CIA and espionage activities, and both possibly connected to the earlier precursor mind control projects of MK ULTRA

The sons of a Cold War scientist who plunged to his death in 1953 several days after unwittingly taking LSD in a CIA mind-control experiment sued the government Wednesday. They claimed the CIA murdered their father, Frank Olson, by pushing him from a 13th-story window of a hotel – not, as the CIA says, that he jumped to his death.

Olson was a bioweapons expert at Fort Detrick, the Army’s biological weapons research center in Maryland. Their lawsuit claims the CIA killed Olson when he developed misgivings after witnessing extreme interrogations in which they allege the CIA committed murder using biological agents Olson had developed.

The CIA had a program in the 1950s and `60s called MK-ULTRA, which involved brainwashing and administering experimental drugs like LSD to unsuspecting individuals. The project was investigated by Congress in the 1970s.

Olson consumed a drink laced with LSD by CIA agents on Nov. 19, 1953, the suit says. Later that month, after being taken to New York City purportedly for a “psychiatric” consultation, Olson plunged to his death.

In a statement, Eric Olson said that the CIA has not given a complete picture of what happened to his father.

“The evidence shows that our father was killed in their custody,” he said. “They have lied to us ever since, withholding documents and information, and changing their story when convenient.”

Source Article Here

Gaurdian Uk Article