Brussels Terror Attack: Signs Point to Another False Flag

Belgian False Flag

It used to be that Al-Qaeda had the conveniently timed Terrorist attacks. Now the new Runner’s up ISIS (ISIL, DAESH) are committing to attacks on western target’s 2000 miles away, instead of oh.. say traveling a couple hundred miles to NEVER attack their sworn enemy, Israel.
Is it also a coincidence, that ISIS terrorist’s would attack the same western Nations that are planning to involve themselves in the Syrian civil war? Now that ISIS is losing it’s fight against the current (legitimate) Syrian regime, wouldn’t it be short of a miracle that these NATO nations would now involve themselves in the conflict to destroy ISIS enemy? Or maybe that’s been the plan all along?

The terrorist attacks at Brussels airport and metro station (coincidentally next to NATO and EU headquarters) has all the hallmarks of a false flag event – designed to further the New World Order agenda to push through Orwellian domestic laws, surveillance, and justify ongoing wars in the Middle East.

As to the location of the bombing, How convenient for NATO then that a terrorist bomb should just happen to go off right near their headquarters.The Brussels attack occurred, obviously, in the capital of the European Union. Now we have a “war on Europe”.
The timing of this Brussels attack is convenient for quite a few reasons. Firstly, it comes 5 days after Turkish dictator Erdogan predicted that Brussels could be the next bombing target after Ankara.
“there is no reason why the bomb that exploded in Ankara cannot explode in Brussels, in any other European city.”

Was this foreknowledge showing that Brussels is a false flag operation?

Multiple Intelligence agencies warned the Belgian government of the possibility of future attacks.Belgian Law enforcement authorities knew of specific threats but did nothing. 2 of the 3 alleged suicide bombers were previously arrested by Belgian Law enforcement, and one was allowed to travel freely back into The Netherlands, even as a known Terrorist suspect.

Once again we are told that this is all just coincidence, that this was all an “un-imagined security failure”. Never mind that these attacks happen in the most heavily surveilled nations on the planet, which will conveniently argue for MORE surveillance of society in order to combat future “terrorism”.

And of course the Mass media’s role in all of this can not be ignored. Within hours of the event’s taking place the mass media released fake CCTV “evidence” and dubious images of the suspects prior to the bombings. Official press releases detailed the chain of evidence that the bombers were so careful to leave behind and implicate them with ISIS.

If ISIS Was Indeed Behind The Attacks, Who Is Behind ISIS? (Something To Think About)

A year ago on March 20th, 137 people were killed from terrorist activity in Yemen, yet no mainstream media headlines. A few days before that, 33 were killed in Afghanistan, the list is very large and goes and and on. Why is it that only certain terrorist attacks are picked up on and covered in depth by western mainstream media? Something to think about.

There is enough documentation out there to support the position that ISIS,and the syrian rebels have been created by the U.S. Military and NATO. And so It’s important to contemplate whether these constant attacks, especially overseas, are a result of incompetence, or Washington’s complicity in protecting the terrorists.

Sources: Your News Wire

Collective Evolution

List Of Proven Historical False Flag Attacks

False-Flag-Operations

A False flag attack is a covert operation designed to deceive so that it appears as though it has been carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed it.

Governments from around the world admit they’ve used false flag attacks. It’s a common practice. Below is a list of proven false flag attacks of the past. This list may help people realise what governments are capable of doing

The Mukden incident – Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army.

The Gleiwitz incident– A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

The Lavon Affair – Israel admited that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed).

Operation Ajax – The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950?s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister

The U.S.S. liberty coverup– The Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship, USS Liberty, by Israeli Air Force jet fighter aircraft and Israeli Navy motor torpedo boats, on 8 June 1967, during the Six-Day War. A combined air and sea attack killed 34 crew members and wounded 171 crew members. The Liberty was a surveillance ship, which was monitoring the ongoing activity and was Attacked in international Waters.

Operation Gladio – The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.

Operation NorthWoods – In 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba .

Gulf of Tonkin incident – The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

Russian Apartment Bombings – Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya .

2001 Anthrax Attacks – Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country. Eventually A framed suspect Bruce Ivins was named as the Anthrax planner. Similarly, the U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war.

Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.” (Ever wonder where ISIS came from…?)

Original Article Here

Suspicious Canada Shooting Triggers ‘Minority Report’ Pre-Crime Plans for ‘Preventive Arrests

?????????????????????????????????

On Wednesday October 22nd, just two days after a “radicalized” man ran over two Canadian soldiers in a mall parking lot, a gunmen opened fire at Canada’s National War Memorial and at Parliament Hill, killing one soldier and wounding a security guard. He was later killed by an armed guard.

Within less than two days, rhetoric has risen unusually high for Canada in the wake of what have been called “terror attacks,” bringing terrorism home along with fresh demands for new police powers.

This time, the new powers would include ‘preventive arrests,’ potentially taking the country down the slippery slope of guilty-until-proven innocent authoritarian policies.

Via CBC News:

Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney is giving more indications of how the government intends to strengthen Canada’s security laws in the wake of Wednesday’s attack in Ottawa on Parliament Hill.

The minister told Radio-Canada on Friday that the government is eyeing the thresholds established in Canadian law for the preventive arrests of people thought to be contemplating attacks that may be linked to terrorism. Officials are considering how to make it easier to press charges against so-called lone-wolf attackers.

A bill was already in the works prior to the shootings to strengthen the Canadian Security Intelligence Services’ (CSIS) powers; Prime Minister Stephen Harper had already announced changes including his belief police powers needed to be increased. That makes this shooting very convenient for Harper’s agenda; now in the wake of this week’s shooting, Harper has stated that work will be “expedited”.

Questions already abound as to where suspect Michael Zehaf-Bibeau even got his the Winchester 30-30 rifle he used in the shooting. Due to his criminal record first and foremost it just proves that gun control doesn’t work. Regardless, in Canada there is no right by law to bear arms. “Canadians, unlike Americans, do not have a constitutional right to bear arms,” the Canadian Supreme Court ruled in 1993.

Original Story Here

ISIS (Islamic State) Another Manufactured “Terror” threat?

ISIScollage

Just as Al-Qeada was a U.S intelligence agency creation, the reports are coming in that ISIS is yet another manufactured terrorist threat. They are given massive amounts of funding by our “allied” intelligence agencies, and have even funded and trained by the U.S directly itself.

-Earlier this month Nabil Na’eem, the founder of the Islamic Democratic Jihad Party and former top al-Qaeda commander, told the Beirut-based pan-Arab TV station al-Maydeen all current al-Qaeda affiliates, including ISIS, work for the CIA.

-In June a Jordanian official told Aaron Klein of WorldNetDaily ISIS members were trained in 2012 by U.S. instructors working at a secret base in Jordan. In 2012 it was reported the U.S., Turkey and Jordan were running a training base for the Syrian rebels

ISIS Leader funded/trained by Israeli Mossad

Baghdaditrained

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi “took intensive military training for a whole year in the hands of Mossad, besides courses in theology and the art of speech,” according to Gulf Daily News, a Bahrainian source. According to a document recently released by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, now the Islamic State, is an intelligence asset.The real name of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is “Simon Elliott.”
The so-called “Elliot” was recruited by the Israeli Mossad and was trained in espionage and psychological warfare against Arab and Islamic societies.

Al-Baghdadi was reportedly a “civilian internee” at Camp Bucca, a U.S. military detention facility near Umm Qasr, Iraq. James Skylar Gerrond, a former U.S. Air Force security forces officer and a compound commander at Camp Bucca in 2006 and 2007, said earlier this month the camp “created a pressure cooker for extremism.”“Circumstantial evidence suggests that al-Baghdadi may have been mind-controlled while held prisoner by the US military in Iraq,” writes Dr. Kevin Barrett.

Ebola Crisis: U.S preparing for future planned Biowarfare?

chemical warfare

With the current Ebola Crisis in West Africa that has killed 1069 patients so far, The ebola crisis fear has spread to the United States. WithIn one week very significant events relating to this crisis just so happened to take place. On July 31st President Obama signed an executive order that allows for the permanent detention of citizens exhibiting signs/symptoms of “respiratory ilnesses”.

The Crazies

Police state USA: The powers currently claimed by the federal government conceivably allow for situations where any communicable disease — even influenza — can become the basis for a large-scale military-enforced federal quarantine in which civil rights are suspended, civilian movement is restricted, and citizens are involuntarily detained — perhaps indefinitely.On July 31st, 2014, President Obama expanded the list of communicable diseases for which the federal government is prepared to institute a quarantine. Together, with the expansions made by previous presidents, the list includes the widest set of potential triggers for suspending American rights that the country has yet seen.

Is this a Coincidence? lets look a little further.
In the same week that, the ebola crisis began to make the headlines, New York City officials and multiple agencies participated in one of the largest surprise Bio-terrorism Drill’s.

biodrill

Disclose TV :August 3, 2014 – officials throughout the city conducted the largest unannounced bio-terror drill in U.S. history. The Rapid Activation for Mass Prophylaxis Exercise (RAMPEx), which had over 1500 participants between 30 locations, was conducted with 13 city agencies as reported by CBS New York. Supposedly, the drill was for airborne bio-weapons such as Anthrax, however, one must question if the true nature of the drill was based on the recent Ebola outbreak.

Also In the same week on August 1st two Americans infected with Ebola were flown back to the U.S.. Pretty strange action to take against a Virus that is 70-90 percent lethal in most cases, something that you would want to quarantine, keep out, not fly back into your country. Could it be related to the fact the CDC and US Government own a patent on a certain strain of the Ebola virus, and need to harvest sample’s from living patients in order to fine tune it into a more lethal bioweapon?

Global Research: Harvesting Ebola from victims to file patents

From the patent description on the EboBun virus, we know that the U.S. government:

1) Extracts Ebola viruses from patients.

2) Claims to have “invented” that virus.

3) Files for monopoly patent protection on the virus.

To understand why this is happening, you have to first understand what a patent really is and why it exists. A patent is a government-enforced monopoly that is exclusively granted to persons or organizations. It allows that person or organization to exclusively profit from the “invention” or deny others the ability to exploit the invention for their own profit.It brings up the obvious question here: Why would the U.S. government claim to have “invented” Ebola and then claim an exclusively monopoly over its owners.

If there is a Bio terrorism event in the United States at any time in the near future, Let the facts stand that the U.S. government holds the world largest repository of Bio-warfare viruses and weapons. So now you know who would be the most likely suspect in this type of event.

Government agents ‘directly involved’ in most high-profile US terror plots

fbi false flag (320 x 284)

Nearly all of the highest-profile domestic terrorism plots in the United States since 9/11 featured the “direct involvement” of government agents or informants, a new report says.

Some of the controversial “sting” operations “were proposed or led by informants”, bordering on entrapment by law enforcement. Yet the courtroom obstacles to proving entrapment are significant, one of the reasons the stings persist.

The lengthy report, released by Human Rights Watch, raises questions about the US criminal justice system’s ability to respect civil rights and due process in post-9/11 terrorism cases. It portrays a system that features not just the sting operations but secret evidence, anonymous juries, extensive pretrial detentions and convictions significantly removed from actual plots.

“In some cases the FBI may have created terrorists out of law-abiding individuals by suggesting the idea of taking terrorist action or encouraging the target to act,” the report alleges.

Out of the 494 cases related to terrorism the US has tried since 9/11, the plurality of convictions – 18% overall – are not for thwarted plots but for “material support” charges, a broad category expanded further by the 2001 Patriot Act that permits prosecutors to pursue charges with tenuous connections to a terrorist act or group.

The report focuses primarily on 27 cases and accordingly stops short of drawing systemic conclusions. It also finds several trials and convictions for “deliberate attempts at terrorism or terrorism financing” that it does not challenge.

Original Article Here